Introduction
Forensic Interview Solutions FIS® provide Investigative Interviewing scenario-based training courses. This sentence is more than a catch phrase. Scenario based training is not the norm in the field and merits some explanation as to why it is crucial in training interviewers.
The use of scenario in interview training plays a pivotal role in preparing students for success. Traditional methods of passive learning, such as reading interview guides or attending lectures, often fail to provide the necessary practical experience. Scenario-based interview training (SBIT), grounded in experiential learning theories, offers an interactive and immersive approach that enhances cognitive retention and application skills. This article explores the virtues of scenario-based interview training through the lens of established learning theories and scholarly research.
1. Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory (ELT)
Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) suggests that learning occurs through a cyclical process of experience, reflection, conceptualization, and active experimentation (Kolb, 1984). Scenario-based training aligns with ELT as it places candidates in simulated interview environments where they can actively engage, reflect on their performance, and refine their responses. Unlike passive learning, this method fosters deeper understanding and skill mastery.
2. Constructivist Learning Theory
According to constructivist theorists such as Vygotsky (1978), knowledge is best acquired through active engagement in problem-solving rather than passive reception of information. Scenario-based training provides a constructivist learning environment where participants learn by “doing” rather than memorizing responses. This active engagement leads to better knowledge retention and adaptability in real-world interviews.
3. Cognitive Load Theory (CLT)
Sweller’s (1988) Cognitive Load Theory states that learning is most effective when cognitive resources are not overwhelmed by excessive information. Scenario-based interview training reduces extraneous cognitive load by providing realistic simulations that help learners focus on essential problem-solving strategies and response articulation, rather than struggling to recall theoretical knowledge under pressure.
4. Behaviorist Theory and Reinforcement Learning
B.F. Skinner’s Behaviorist Learning Theory (1954) emphasizes the role of reinforcement and feedback in learning. Scenario-based training integrates immediate feedback mechanisms, allowing candidates to refine their answers and behaviors based on coaching or AI-driven responses. This repetitive reinforcement strengthens behavioral patterns that lead to better interview performance.
Conclusion
Scenario-based interview training is a superior alternative to passive learning due to its strong alignment with cognitive and behavioral learning theories. It enhances knowledge retention, adaptability, and real-world application of skills. Given the overwhelming scholarly support for active learning methodologies, integrating scenario-based training into interview training programs is not just beneficial but essential.
References:
Bankert, T.M. (2024). Scenario–Based Training in Law Enforcement. Retrieved from ProQuest.
Das, N.K., Mukhida, S., Chate, S., & Das, P. (2024). Recall-based theory question paper pattern: How long we used it?Retrieved from LWW Journals.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Scott, S., Millar, B.C., & McClean, S. (2024). Education and Training in Biomedical Science. British Journal of Biomedical Science. Retrieved from Frontiers Partnerships.
Shepard, J.C. (2024). MBE Bar Exam Prep 2025-2026: 800 MBE Practice Questions and Answers with Detailed Explanations. Retrieved from Google Books.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty, and Instructional Design. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, X., Zhang, B., & Gao, H. (2024).Developing and Validating an Instrument for Assessing Learning Sciences Competence of Doctoral Students in Education in China.Sustainability. Retrieved fromMDPI.
